- PII
- S3034608825060063-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034608825060063
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 59 / Issue number 6
- Pages
- 418-424
- Abstract
- Oxidative processes during exposure of crystalline sucrose samples to non-thermal argon plasma were investigated for the first time. The aim of the work was to compare the oxidizing abilities of non-thermal plasma and gamma radiation when exposed to sucrose using EPR spectrometry. The EPR signal intensity was found to increase with increasing plasma treatment time, indicating the presence of oxidative processes and free radical formation. A decrease in the signal intensity was observed with the passage of time. On average, the signal intensity decreased by 9% at week 1, 13% at week 3, 15% at week 11 and 22% at week 22 relative to the untreated sample. Based on the data obtained, a comparative analysis was performed on the amount of free radicals formed in sucrose (carbon-centered) during treatment with non-thermal plasma and gamma radiation.
- Keywords
- сахароза нетермальная аргоновая плазма гамма-излучение электронный парамагнитный резонанс (ЭПР) углерод-центрированный радикал
- Date of publication
- 23.07.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 20
References
- 1. Iravani S., Soufi G.J. // Biomedical Spectroscopy and Imaging. 2020. V. 9. №. 3–4. P. 165–182. https://doi.org/10.3233/BSI-200206
- 2. Barba F.J., Roohinejad S., Ishikawa K., et al. // Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2020. V. 100. P. 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.032
- 3. Vrielinck H., Kusakovskij J., Vanhaelewyn G., et al. // Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2014. V. 159. №. 1–4. P. 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu168
- 4. Karakirova Y., Yordanova V. // Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2021. V. 184. P. 109469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109469
- 5. De Cooman H., Keysabyl J., Kusakovskij J., et al. // The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2013. V. 117. №. 24. P. 7169–7178. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp400053h
- 6. Karakirova Y., Yordanov N.D. // Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2020. V. 168. P. 108569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108569
- 7. Nakagawa K., Nishio T. // Radiation research. 2000. V. 153. № 6. P. 835–839. https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587 (2000) 153[0835:EPRIOS]2.0.CO;2
- 8. Tikhonov V., Gorbatov S., Ivanov I., Tikhonov A. // 2020 7th International Congress on Energy Fluxes and Radiation Effects (EFRE). Tomsk, Russia, 2020. P. 596. https://doi.org/10.1109/EFRE47760.2020.9242089
- 9. Kharlamov V.A., Polyakova I.V., Gorbatov S.A., et al. // Instruments and Experimental Techniques. 2022. V. 65. № 6. P. 995–999. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441222060057
- 10. Меджидов И.М., Полякова И.В., Горбатов С.А. и др. // Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Сер. Естественные науки. 2023. 4 (109). С. 141–158. https://doi.org/10.18698/1812-3368-2023-4-141-158
